Participación Social. La medida de resultado más esperada en neurorrehabilitación.
César Cuesta-García
Resumen
La participación social o comunitaria es una preocupación para las personas afectadas por daño cerebral. En muchas ocasiones tras el alta de rehabilitación, no se encuentran preparadas para vivir en la comunidad ni para participar en los roles de la vida deseados. A pesar de que la participación social es un indicador clave de éxito en la neurorrehabilitación y reconocida como una medida de resultado por toda la comunidad socio-sanitaria, encontramos una falta de claridad y consenso, en lo relativo a las heramientas de evaluación y recomendaciones sobre las mejores intervenciones. Esta editorial trata la participación social, desde un punto de vista conceptual y p´ractico. Pretendemos generar un espacio de reflexión y ofrecer algunas directrices basadas en la evidencia científica para la evaluación y para la intervención centrada en la participación.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Baum, C. M. (2011). Fulfilling the promise: Supporting participation in daily life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.010.
Bergström, A., Guidetti, S., Tham, K., & Eriksson, G. (2017). Association between satisfaction and participation in everyday occupations after stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 24(5), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2016.1245782
Boop, C., Cahill, S. M., Davis, C., Dorsey, J., Gibbs, V., Herr, B., Kearney, K., Liz Griffin Lannigan, E., Metzger, L., Miller, J., Owens, A., Rives, K., Synovec, C., Winistorfer, W. L., & Lieberman, D. (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process fourth edition. In American Journal of Occupational Therapy (Vol. 74, Issue August). https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
Brown, M., Dijkers, M. P. J. M., Gordon, W. A., Ashman, T., Charatz, H., & Cheng, Z. (2004). Participation objective, participation subjective:A measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 19(6), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200411000-00004
Bueby, J. (2022). Powerful Practice: A Model for Authentic Occupational Therapy. Occupational Therapy In Health Care, 36(4), 497–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380577.2021.1988802
Chang, F. H., Coster, W. J., & Helfrich, C. A. (2013). Community participation measures for people with disabilities: A systematic review of content from an international classification of functioning, disability and health perspective. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(4), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.031
Cuesta-García, C., Simón-Vicente, L., Carpena-Niño, M. G., & Navarrete-Muñoz, E. M. (2021). Evaluación de la funcionalidad del miembro superior en personas adultas con daño cerebral adquirido realizada por los/as profesionales de la terapia ocupacional en España, estudio transversal. Journal of MOVE and Therapeutic Science, 3(1), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.37382/JOMTS.V3I1.467
da Silva, A. C. C., & Oliver, F. C. (2021). Social participation in occupational therapy: Is it possible to establish a consensus? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 68(6), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12763
Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30(10), 2131–2140. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131
Egan, M., Kessler, D., Duong, P., Gurgel-Juarez, N., Linkewich, E., Sikora, L., Montgomery, P., & Chopra, A. (2020). Participation-focused interventions for stroke rehabilitation: A scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(12), 2666–2672. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00387
Egan, M. Y., Laliberté-Rudman, D., Rutkowski, N., Lanoix, M., Meyer, M., McEwen, S., Collver, M., Linkewich, E., Montgomery, P., Quant, S., Donnelly, B., & Fearn, J. (2020). The implications of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for design and allocation of rehabilitation after hospital discharge: a problematization. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(23), 3403–3415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1592244
Engel-Yeger, B., Tse, T., Josman, N., Baum, C., & Carey, L. M. (2018). Scoping Review: The Trajectory of Recovery of Participation Outcomes following Stroke. Behavioural Neurology, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5472018
Eyssen, I. C., Steultjens, M. P., Dekker, J., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: Challenges in defining participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(6), 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.006
Heinemann, A. W. (2010). Measurement of participation in rehabilitation research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9 SUPPL.), S1–S4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.155
Huebner, R. A., Johnson, K., Bennett, C. M., & Schneck, C. (2003). Community Participation and Quality of Life Outcomes After Adult Traumatic Brain Injury. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(2), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.2.177
Instituto de Migraciones y Servicios Sociales (IMSERSO). (2001). OrganizaciónMundial de la Salud. Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y del la Salud. OMS.Josman, N., Connor, L. T., & Lin, D. J. (2020). Editorial: Performance and Participation Outcomes for Individuals With Neurological Conditions. Frontiers in Neurology, 11(September), 15–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00878
Kapoor, A., Lanctôt, K. L., Bayley, M., Kiss, A., Herrmann, N., Murray, B. J., & Swartz, R. H. (2017). “Good Outcome” Isn’t Good Enough. 1688–1690. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016728
Kessler, D., Egan, M., Dubouloz, C. J., McEwen, S., & Graham, F. P. (2017). Occupational Performance Coaching for stroke survivors: A pilot randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(3). https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.024216
Lee, D., Heffron, J. L., & Mirza, M. (2019). Content and Effectiveness of Interventions Focusing on Community Participation Poststroke: A Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(11),2179-2192.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.008
Mackenzie, L., Coppola, S., Alvarez, L., Cibule, L., Maltsev, S., Loh, S. Y., Mlambo, T., Ikiugu, M. N., Pihlar, Z., Sriphetcharawut, S., Baptiste, S., & Ledgerd, R. (2017). International occupational therapy research priorities: A delphi study. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 37(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449216687528
Mallinson, T., & Hammel, J. (2010). Measurement of participation: Intersecting person, task, and environment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9 SUPPL.), S29–S33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.027
McClure, J., & Leah, C. (2021). Is independence enough? Rehabilitation should include autonomy and social engagement to achieve quality of life. Clinical Rehabilitation, 35(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520954344
Mountain, A., Patrice Lindsay, M., Teasell, R., Salbach, N. M., de Jong, A., Foley, N., Bhogal, S., Bains, N., Bowes, R., Cheung, D., Corriveau, H., Joseph, L., Lesko, D., Millar, A., Parappilly, B., Pikula, A., Scarfone, D., Rochette, A., Taylor, T., ... Cameron, J. I. (2020). Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part Two: Transitions and Community Participation Following Stroke. International Journal of Stroke, 15(7), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019897847
Obembe, A. O., & Eng, J. J. (2016). Rehabilitation Interventions for Improving Social Participation After Stroke : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315597072
Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain & Process 2nd Edition. (2008). The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(6), 625–683. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.6.625
Pohl, J., Held, J. P. O., Verheyden, G., Alt Murphy, M., Engelter, S., Flöel, A., Keller, T., Kwakkel, G., Nef, T., Ward, N., Luft, A. R., & Veerbeek, J. M. (2020). Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke—A Delphi Study. Frontiers in Neurology, 11(September), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00875
Whiteneck, G., & Dijkers, M. P. (2009). Difficult to Measure Constructs: Conceptual and Methodological Issues Concerning Participation and Environmental Factors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(11 SUPPL. 1), S22–S35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.009